Zubeen Garg Death Case: SIT Uncovers Crore Level Money Trail

Zubeen Garg Death Case: SIT Reveals Financial Motive Behind Murder

The investigation into the death of iconic Assamese singer Zubeen Garg has taken a disturbing turn, with Assam Police now placing financial greed at the centre of the alleged murder plot. According to submissions made before a court by a Special Investigation Team (SIT), the singer’s former manager is accused not only of siphoning off crores of rupees but of allegedly killing Garg to protect those illicit gains.

Assam Police SIT investigates Zubeen Garg death case as court hears details of alleged financial motive and property attachment plea.
Zubeen Garg Murder Case: Police Expose Shocking Money Motive

The revelations mark a critical moment in the Zubeen Garg death case, transforming it from a tragic personal loss into a complex criminal investigation involving money laundering, benami transactions, and property attachment under India’s new criminal laws.


SIT Tells Court Money Was the Main Motive

In its submission before the Kamrup (Metro) Sessions Court, the SIT stated that financial gain was the primary motive behind the alleged murder. Investigators accused Siddharth Sharma, Garg’s former manager, of systematically misappropriating the singer’s earnings over time.

According to the police, once the flow of money came under threat, Sharma allegedly decided to eliminate the singer to retain control over the siphoned funds. This assertion significantly escalates the gravity of the case, positioning it as a financially motivated homicide rather than an isolated criminal act.


Assam Police Seek Property Attachment Under BNSS

As part of its legal strategy, the SIT has moved the court seeking attachment and forfeiture of assets under Section 107 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The property in question is the Mahabir Aqua Water Plant, in which Sharma allegedly invested around ₹1.10 crore.

Why the Water Plant Is Under Scanner

Investigators warned the court that if the property is not attached immediately, Sharma and his alleged business partner Chetan Dhirasaria could liquidate the asset. Such liquidation, police argued, would severely impact any future compensation that may be awarded to the victim’s family.

The SIT emphasized that the attachment is necessary to preserve proceeds of crime while the trial continues.


Money Laundering and Benami Transactions Alleged

In its observations, the court noted that investigators conducted a detailed probe into the source of funds invested in the water plant. The SIT claimed that the money did not originate from legitimate income but from funds misappropriated from Zubeen Garg.

According to police findings, Sharma allegedly used benami transactions and layered financial movements to convert illegally acquired cash into seemingly legitimate business investments. These actions, the SIT said, form the legal basis for invoking asset forfeiture provisions.


Cash Show Fees and Forged Banking Practices

One of the most troubling aspects of the investigation relates to how the singer’s earnings were allegedly handled. The SIT informed the court that Sharma routinely accepted show fees in cash on Garg’s behalf and deliberately avoided depositing the money into official or traceable bank accounts.

Investigators further claimed that cash was deposited through employees, relatives, and third parties, a method commonly associated with laundering illicit funds. This practice, police argued, helped disguise the origin of the money while maintaining control over large sums.


Sudden Rise in Wealth Raises Red Flags

The SIT also highlighted a glaring mismatch between Sharma’s known income and his investments. Until November 2022, he was reportedly earning a monthly salary of ₹57,000 from TM Ventures Pvt. Ltd.

Despite this modest income, Sharma allegedly went on to invest crores within a short period, raising serious red flags. A forensic audit and financial analysis, conducted by an empanelled chartered accountant firm, reportedly traced the flow of funds across multiple accounts and entities.


What the Zubeen Garg Death Case Means Beyond One Crime

Beyond the immediate allegations, the Zubeen Garg death case exposes broader issues within the entertainment industry particularly the unchecked financial control often exercised by managers over artists’ earnings.

Legal experts note that the case could set an important precedent for:

  • Asset attachment in high profile criminal cases
  • Accountability in artist manager financial relationships
  • Application of BNSS provisions in financial crime investigations

Investigation Still Ongoing

The SIT has clarified that the investigation is far from complete. Authorities are continuing to examine financial records, business partnerships, and potential accomplices. Further arrests or additional asset attachments are not being ruled out.

For now, the court will decide on the property attachment plea, a move that could significantly shape the trajectory of the case.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What is the motive behind Zubeen Garg’s murder, according to the police?
Assam Police claim the murder was financially motivated, linked to siphoned funds.

Who is Siddharth Sharma in the case?
He is Zubeen Garg’s former manager and the prime accused.

Why is Mahabir Aqua Water Plant being attached?
Police allege it was funded using misappropriated money from the singer.

What is Section 107 of BNSS?
It allows authorities to attach and forfeit property linked to criminal proceeds.

Is the investigation complete?
No. The SIT has stated that the probe is still ongoing.


Final Note

As new details emerge, the Zubeen Garg death case continues to shock fans and raise uncomfortable questions about trust, money, and power behind the scenes of fame. The coming months will be crucial in determining accountability and justice in one of Assam’s most high profile criminal investigations.

    Leave a Comment